Washington Climate Commitment Act
Cap-and-invest that voters kept - at a cost at the pump.
C · 15/24
1 · The idealist case (in its proponents' own framing)
Cap emissions and invest the proceeds.
2 · The realist counter-case
Critics cite gas-price effects.
3 · Predicted vs. measured — with caveats
$2.149B collected ($1.484B above forecast); allowance price ~doubled; repeal I-2117 defeated ~62-38 (2024).
4 · Liberty check
Climate goal vs. cost-of-living impact.
5 · The real tradeoff
Voters kept it; the pump cost is partly oil-driven.
Allies & Playbook
If you want to copy this, start here.
No individual sponsor record is catalogued for this policy yet. Start with the primary sources below and the Allies directory.